X plane 10 skymaxx pro how to#
X plane 10 skymaxx pro update#
X plane 10 skymaxx pro pro#
X plane 10 skymaxx pro code#

The вЂњfog bugвЂќ* is different вЂ“ it can only be fixed inside X-Plane вЂ“ thatвЂ™s on us, and thereвЂ™s a fix in progress.ДЇor the ATC networks, I think itвЂ™s a question of immersionвЂ¦at some point an AI ATC is never going to be as immersive as having real live humans with VoIP.

X plane 10 skymaxx pro pro#

So I donвЂ™t see Skymaxx Pro as taking the pressure off of us to fix bugs in our own weather system rather I see them reaching an audience that didnвЂ™t like the вЂwhatвЂ™ of what we coded, not the вЂhowвЂ™. Other users love Skymaxx Pro, were never happy with our weather, and now consider what we did obsolete. Some users love our weather and donвЂ™t see any value to SkyMaxx Pro. Therefore it doesnвЂ™t surprise me that we get two very different responses on weather. That decision was partly a technical and business decision, but itвЂ™s also partly aesthetic. I see Skymaxx Pro as taking a very different approach to clouds than what we use вЂ“ we looked at multiple third party cloud engines during v10 dev and picked the solution we ship now. IвЂ™m just curious because the SkyMaxx Pro developers, on their blog, have said that they have worked closely with you on the product. Same with the inbuilt ATC vs online ATC networks etc? But when thereвЂ™s a high quality third party add-on readily available, which, by the sound of it, does a particular job better than the existing inbuilt solution, does that dissuade you at all from spending time on further development for that part of the sim? I recall that you have stated on a number of occasions that the fog problem is one which you guys are intending to address at some stage. It did make me wonder though, does LR take into account the availability of add-ons when deciding where to focus future development? For example, a lot of commenters on your (excellent, informative and insightful!) blog have bemoaned the lack of towering cumulus and poorly implemented fog. IвЂ™ll be sure to try it out, but I might wait until I have a more powerful computer first. Thanks for highlighting what looks like a great add-on.

X plane 10 skymaxx pro code#

The next-gen CSL code sample that is linked from the article is tested and works correctly too.

custom particle system drawing or any kind of effects code), please review the tech note, and email me if you have questions. If your plugin does any 3-d drawing (e.g. This is the time to draw translucent prop discs, coach marks and labels, clouds, smoke and particle systems, etc.

The second callback is after lights have been mixed at this point normal OpenGL drawing works reliably (albeit without spill lights being mixed in).

The first callback is for drawing вЂњsolidвЂќ stuff that will be affected by spill lights the only safe thing you can do from this callback is to call XPLMDrawObject.

In particular, you get called twice when your plugin requests to draw in 3-d:

X plane 10 skymaxx pro how to#

I have updated the X-Plane SDK tech-note on 3-d drawing to contain modern guidance on how to cope with 3-d drawing callbacks. Getting a plugin that draws in 3-d to work with HDR mode requires some caution the plugin APIs for drawing were designed in X-Plane 6, when вЂdeferred renderingвЂ™ didnвЂ™t even exist as a concept. (I hate to see users have to pick between HDR and third party add-ons we want HDR to be the basis for superior next-generation aircraft and scenery.) From the user reports IвЂ™ve read, performance in HDR mode is good.

X plane 10 skymaxx pro update#

X-Aviation just posted an update to SkyMaxx Pro вЂ“ the new 1.1 patch brings big performance improvements and fixes rendering problems with HDR.